<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>The Mummy (1932)</title>
        <link>http://cinemadrome.yuku.com/topic/792/t/The-Mummy-1932-.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ Karl Freund really was a master with a camera. His cinematography is why the Bela Lugosi DRACULA is still remembered today. It holds up pretty badly on just
about every other count, but damn, is it pretty to look at. Some extraordinary atmosphere. I&#39;ve always suspected Freund was battling director Tod
Browning over that one. I&#39;ve been puzzled by the good reputation Browning had come to enjoy among genre aficionados in recent years. As a director, he is,
in spite of a very few moments... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:59:49 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:47:37 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Mummy (1932) ]]></title>
			<link>http://cinemadrome.yuku.com/reply/2004/t/The-Mummy-1932-.html#reply-2004</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Thirty years ago, The Mummy was such a staple of Saturday afternoon TV that I never expected it needing advocacy before new audiences.  Thanks for the insights
and appreciation of Karloff&#39;s performance, just in time for Halloween.
<br>
<br>
I won&#39;t dispute Freund&#39;s great importance to Dracula, but still will have to put in a good word on Browning&#39;s behalf.  I recall in Dark Carnival
the claim that he and Lon Chaney previously had discussed the possibility of making a genuine... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (tjb)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://cinemadrome.yuku.com/sreply/2004</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:47:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Mummy (1932) ]]></title>
			<link>http://cinemadrome.yuku.com/reply/1974/t/The-Mummy-1932-.html#reply-1974</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ If only the Spanish version had Lugosi in it! But without him I find it rather overlong and pointless. I just get the idea that Browning wasn&#39;t interested
in cinema so much as a kind of filmed macabre vaudville, which MARK OF THE VAMPIRE suggests. He also has a tendency to defantasize horror.
<br>
<br>
Just watched part of MAD LOVE again. Very impressive visually with a lot of expressiont touches and a great Lorre performance. Totally ridiculous scripting
really sinks it eventually. Too... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (bobmonel)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://cinemadrome.yuku.com/sreply/1974</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 10:38:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Mummy (1932) ]]></title>
			<link>http://cinemadrome.yuku.com/reply/1969/t/The-Mummy-1932-.html#reply-1969</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ All of the great images from DRACULA--the camera gliding through the cellars of Dracula&#39;s castle as the Count and his wraith-like brides emerge, the foggy
carriage-ride (before the stupid rubber bat moment), Dracula&#39;s wrath as he takes out Renfield on the stairs, etc.--seem to be Freund&#39;s work. You
don&#39;t see anything like them in Browning&#39;s other films; they turn up in Freund&#39;s later work. The gliding camera goes with Freund to his two
directed features. The <a... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (jriddle73)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://cinemadrome.yuku.com/sreply/1969</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:04:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Mummy (1932) ]]></title>
			<link>http://cinemadrome.yuku.com/reply/1962/t/The-Mummy-1932-.html#reply-1962</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Well, you shouldn&#39;t apologize because it is a much better FILM than DRACULA simply because it is more a VISUAL experience. Those are the key words.
It&#39;s what you don&#39;t see: the trailing wrappings, the fact that you only see it as The Mummy, for a few seconds, etc. I don&#39;t return to it as much
as DRACULA, though, for some reason. Maybe the pacing. But that&#39;s not a flaw in the film. I think Freund may have actually directed parts of DRACULA, in
the Browning bio DARK... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (bobmonel)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://cinemadrome.yuku.com/sreply/1962</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:17:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ The Mummy (1932) ]]></title>
			<link>http://cinemadrome.yuku.com/topic/792/t/The-Mummy-1932-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Karl Freund really was a master with a camera. His cinematography is why the Bela Lugosi DRACULA is still remembered today. It holds up pretty badly on just
about every other count, but <em>damn</em>, is it pretty to look at. Some extraordinary atmosphere. I&#39;ve always suspected Freund was battling director Tod
Browning over that one. I&#39;ve been puzzled by the good reputation Browning had come to enjoy among genre aficionados in recent years. As a director, he is,
in spite of a very few... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (jriddle73)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://cinemadrome.yuku.com/topic/792</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 21:59:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>